So, what was that Busan thing, anyway? And what do I need to know about it?

How implementers and advocates need to work together to make sure the global community delivers on its promise of more effective aid.

October 2nd, 2012 | by Gregory Adams

Aid is a vital tool in the fight against global poverty. But too often, aid delivers less than it promises.

If you follow the debate over development aid, you’ve probably heard that there was a big conference last year in Korea that was meant to make aid work better. Oxfam’s new briefing paper—“Busan in a Nutshell”—is intended as your guide to what happened at that conference, the “Fourth High Level Forum on Aid Effectiveness.” “Busan in a Nutshell” explains what happened at Busan, and how implementers and advocates need to work together to make sure the global community delivers on its promise of more effective aid.

Since the Paris Declaration of 2005, donors, recipients, advocates, and others have been working to improve aid so it delivers better poverty fighting results. Last year, in Busan, these groups met to form the “Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation,” which sets the international standard on the principles of effective aid and good development to which all development actors should subscribe.

Busan in a Nutshell” documents the commitments made at Busan, and recommends how to ensure aid effectiveness commitments are implemented. These principles include:

Alice collecting some of her ground nut crop, Copperbelt, Zambia (2006) Emma Walsh/Oxfam

All development stakeholders—including traditional donors and emerging providers—must respect and uphold these key principles by fulfilling the promises they made at Busan. For this to happen, the Global Partnership will need to rely on strong vision, high-level political engagement and a robust but flexible global accountability mechanism.

The US government has already begun its efforts to implement its Busan commitments. A few big changes include their efforts to increase transparency of the aid they give, put more American aid dollars through local systems, and end complicated rules that make local investment difficult. Ultimately, however, the real verdict on US efforts will come from how well citizens and leaders in developing countries think the US is supporting their efforts to develop themselves.

Check out “Busan in a Nutshell” to learn more about what is at stake for the leaders of the Global Partnership at their first meeting next week in Tokyo.

Comments

One Response to “So, what was that Busan thing, anyway? And what do I need to know about it?”

  1. The Power Impact Analysis of Busan is clear.

    The basis of Busan is giving the powers that be in the Third World the role of gatekeeper on what happens and what not. Most politicians are not focused primarily on the poorest of the poor, not in the North, not in the South. With the added role of gatekeeper for all funding, the reasons for listening to the poor are even less.

    Of course, for poverty oriented democratic governments this will not matter too much. I fear not all governments can be labeled this way.

    All the other stipulations are subservient to the impact on the power relations of Busan.

    Sorry, it is all a dream, Why, as Oxfam, not empower the poor in relation to their government?

Join the discussion

Author

Gregory Adams

He leads Oxfam's work to increase the effectiveness of US foreign aid by placing the voices and priorities of poor people at the center of aid policy and practice. Prior to joining Oxfam, he spent over ten years working in Congress on national security and foreign affairs issues, particularly development assistance. He is a frequent commentator in the media including the Washington Post, Foreign Policy magazine, Politico and NPR.

See more posts from